Tooling is a key component on the approach to any plastics process. Even subtle changes in a mold can lead to huge process variations. There are many different categories in which molds as a controlling factor are found at the top of the list. This article will touch on several of tooling's primary influences on a plastic process:
-Watering: Early in the initial stages of the crossover from convential molding to scientific method, a debate was often seen on the production floor whether directional water flow had any influence on a molding process. I can tell you first hand, it is a PRIMARY consideration. I have run into numerous situations where a process was found to be outside normal operating conditions due to changes in directional flow. Many companies are reducing the impact of this factor by simply hard plumming their tools to assure consistent watering. I highly recommend this practice...As I've said in several of the previous articles: the key to repeating process consistency is repeatability of your set up procedure!
-Vents: Vents are not just a pretty channel installed for the purpose of impressing your customers. Materials produce gas..both in the barrel through shear, as well as they are moving in the flowfront. Vents should be inspected and cleaned on every tool once per shift...NO EXCEPTIONS. Whenever you run into a molding issue that could directly relate to a flowfront or gas trap issue, you should first inspect and clean your mold before any process change is made. When running a tool new to the floor, you may experience unfill or burn conditions in the end of fill area...and on occasion, just a repeating area with no relationship to end of fill. There are numerous approaches to fixing these sort of problems. It is important to remember in any molding issue...take the simple approach first! A method of testing to see if a vent should be installed would be to take pieces of aluminum tape and tape these in two pieces with the are between the taping resembling a vent channel. If your process seems to respond well to this "pseudo-vent", then it may be a good approach to place a vent in the area. I will write an article that gets more detailed in the different venting issues later...
Top of Mold: Ever run into a situation where it seems like no matter what approach you take, you can't seem to get rid of a contamination issue? Let me ask you this...how often do you clean the top of your mold, and when was the last time you did so? Cleaning the top of your tool can be as important as cleaning the cavitational areas themself.
Grease: Grease is such a touchy area... because you have to ride the middle line when applying it. A moldmaker is right when he says, "you can't have too much grease". True...this is good for tooling that repetitively pulls apart, and compresses under tonnage. But grease can be a processor's worst nightmare...for instance when it bleeds off of ejectors, or splatters off of pins into the part cavity. A good point to make here is that if you are spraying down the moveable half of your tool while cleaning, you could be setting yourself up for failure. Mold cleaner breaks down grease, and can lead to an oily mess that is out of control. When cleaning the moveable half, spray mold cleaner on your rag...then wipe the tool down.
Noise: Learn to listen to your mold... a mold should make certain noises when in good running condition. Squeals, cracking and thumps are warning signs. Learn to recognize them and take steps to inspect your tool and make corrections to your clamping setpoints as a precaution to causing tool damage.
Mold Safe and Low pressure close: If these terms mean nothing to you, stop what you are doing IMMEDIATELY and find someone who knows what they do and how to set them! This will save you alot of downtime and frantic tool repairs to make shipment.
Water: Can't stress water enough...when you are running a good process, you should document the to/ from pressure of each circuit, as well as get mold temperature data from several different points in your tool at a running state temperature. This will save you tons of headaches when an issue arrises and you need to verify whether these factors have changed.
More tooling articles to follow. This is a very huge subject, and I will have to write numerous pieces to cover it all. Point to be made is, that tooling can define you...or defeat you instead. It is all determined by your ability to recognize potential causes of part defects, and analyze the data associated with it.
Subscribe To Plastics Processing 101
Posts
All Comments
Tuesday, December 2, 2008
Sunday, November 30, 2008
How Plastic Material is Made : Extrusion
Plastic injection processors mold material every day .. but do you know how it is produced? There are keys in the extrusion process that can sometimes interpret potential problems on the molding floor. This artticle will explain the process and its relevence to plastic injection.
Material starts as a mixture of powders.. there is a base (such as ABS, Polypropylene,etc.), sometimes additives to improve the blend (in ex: UV to reduce sun damage, or fiberglass to increase rigidity) and pigmented colors to give the material its desired hue.
The extrusion press has similar characteristics of its injection counterpart...it has a screw for blending and moving the material forward. The barrel containing the screw has heater bands to help control primary shear heat. The difference is, the screw does not shoot material...it merely spins. As it rotates, the material is forced out a faceplate with holes drilled into it called a "head". As the material comes out of the holes, it is formed into strands.
These material strands are pulled by the machine operator down a long trough, called a "water bed". The strands run at the bottom of the bed, being held in place by a series of rollers to keep the strands submerged. Towards the end of the bed, the strands are allowed to come above the water through several sets of brushes. The brushes are used to wipe the water off of the strands.
At this point,the strands run through a series of air blowers to remove the remainder of the water. The strands run from the blowers into a large machine similar to a grinder, called a pelletizer. The pelletizer cuts the strands into uniform chunks...the pellet that is familiar to you. Pellet length is controlled by the speed (RPM) that the pelletizer turns. The faster the blades turn, the shorter the pellet size. The pellets also go over a vibrating tray, designed to remove fines.
Pellet diameter is controlled by screw RPM...the faster the screw is ran, the larger the pellet diameter will be.
Now that we have outlined the extrusion process, we will identify elements that can affect the plastic injection side of the equation:
-material changeover: The screw is pulled often when changing material types (such as polypro to ABS) or when going from a dark to light color. This is why it is important to pay attention to lot changes. The beginning and end of an extrusion process is when problems with lots are most likely to occur. When problems point towards a material issue, the lot should be checked for a)whether it was a beginning of lot container and b) material should be checked visually for consistency if it was produced at the end of lot. Pellet diameter and length are important dimensions.
-Base material: The potential for a mistaken base material or improper blend of base, additives and pigment exists. This is generally going to happen at the beginning of a material lot.
-contamination: When running light or clear materials, one of the first things to check when there are scrap issues associated with contamination is a visual inspection of the material being used for contamination within the pellets, and whether the lot being used has changed or is a beginning of run container. The potential exists for an improper screw cleaning, or a contaminated blend receptacle used to blend the powders. The potential for excessive fines (material ran through vibration portion of pelletizer too fast) also exists.
Inspecting for these things can sometimes help you better understand where a problem's roots lie. Most extrusion manufacturers are happy to work with you when problems are found. It takes both extrusion and injection working together to develop product efficiencies.
Material starts as a mixture of powders.. there is a base (such as ABS, Polypropylene,etc.), sometimes additives to improve the blend (in ex: UV to reduce sun damage, or fiberglass to increase rigidity) and pigmented colors to give the material its desired hue.
The extrusion press has similar characteristics of its injection counterpart...it has a screw for blending and moving the material forward. The barrel containing the screw has heater bands to help control primary shear heat. The difference is, the screw does not shoot material...it merely spins. As it rotates, the material is forced out a faceplate with holes drilled into it called a "head". As the material comes out of the holes, it is formed into strands.
These material strands are pulled by the machine operator down a long trough, called a "water bed". The strands run at the bottom of the bed, being held in place by a series of rollers to keep the strands submerged. Towards the end of the bed, the strands are allowed to come above the water through several sets of brushes. The brushes are used to wipe the water off of the strands.
At this point,the strands run through a series of air blowers to remove the remainder of the water. The strands run from the blowers into a large machine similar to a grinder, called a pelletizer. The pelletizer cuts the strands into uniform chunks...the pellet that is familiar to you. Pellet length is controlled by the speed (RPM) that the pelletizer turns. The faster the blades turn, the shorter the pellet size. The pellets also go over a vibrating tray, designed to remove fines.
Pellet diameter is controlled by screw RPM...the faster the screw is ran, the larger the pellet diameter will be.
Now that we have outlined the extrusion process, we will identify elements that can affect the plastic injection side of the equation:
-material changeover: The screw is pulled often when changing material types (such as polypro to ABS) or when going from a dark to light color. This is why it is important to pay attention to lot changes. The beginning and end of an extrusion process is when problems with lots are most likely to occur. When problems point towards a material issue, the lot should be checked for a)whether it was a beginning of lot container and b) material should be checked visually for consistency if it was produced at the end of lot. Pellet diameter and length are important dimensions.
-Base material: The potential for a mistaken base material or improper blend of base, additives and pigment exists. This is generally going to happen at the beginning of a material lot.
-contamination: When running light or clear materials, one of the first things to check when there are scrap issues associated with contamination is a visual inspection of the material being used for contamination within the pellets, and whether the lot being used has changed or is a beginning of run container. The potential exists for an improper screw cleaning, or a contaminated blend receptacle used to blend the powders. The potential for excessive fines (material ran through vibration portion of pelletizer too fast) also exists.
Inspecting for these things can sometimes help you better understand where a problem's roots lie. Most extrusion manufacturers are happy to work with you when problems are found. It takes both extrusion and injection working together to develop product efficiencies.
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Scientific Molding:Definition and application
Injection molding came a long way in a relatively short span in the realm of the industrial age. In the beginning, molding was more of an art form than it was a science. John Bozzelli and some of the other pioneers in decoupled and scientific molding changed all of that. They developed new molding techniques based on processing variable replication that revolutionized the methods of an entire industry. Today's article defines the practice of "scientific molding" and will touch on some of the fundamentals that this application supports.
Scientific molding is best defined as an extension of decoupled molding theory. When using decoupled molding procedures, a process is established with the part filling out at 95-98% of being completely filled with pack and hold pressures set at 0. A typical part at this percentage would appear slightly unfilled, or with a sinky appearance. Pack and hold are then added back into the process adding just enough to pack out the part(s).
Where scientific molding takes a step further is the extension of this procedure. The procedure of decoupling is completed, and then all data that can be recorded is taken..in essence taking a "snapshot" of the process while it is in a good running state. Typical molding variables to be accounted for are melt temperature,cushion, fill time, recovery time, peak pressure, cycle time and any other actuals data that can be recorded. The ones listed here are the basics, but I'm a bit more thorough. For instance, I like to get:
- actual mold temps in several locations(running state)
-water pressure(to and from process)
-barrel temperature actuals(each zone, using probe)
-replication of water set up(hard plummed, or water set up sheet, repeating flow directions)
-decomp.aft. rotation actual
The primary point of scientific theory is to repeat the process set-up and actuals to assure that a good process results by repeating the previous values. Because of this, it is only logical that the more data you are able to document when a job is running well, the more likely you will be able to repeat the molding condition the next time around.
That is a basic description...now for a little more advanced version, let's touch on some additional testing procedures...
-In addition to melt temp, a hold pressure study should be completed to determine the gate seal time
-With the shot size set at 85%, back pressure should be raised in increments...stopping the screw after allowing soak time during cycle to perform a melt temperature reading. This data should be recorded on a graph. When the melt temperature stops rising, this is the max setpoint for back pressure. Back pressure should be set at the point in the graph that major temperature increases falter, and melt temperature rises are more subtle in their rise.
-With the shot size set at 85%, velocities should be adjusted from slow to fast, graphing as described above. This time, fill time is the factor to watch. When fill stabilizes and the time stays equal, you have maxxed out your velocities. Again, optimally the velocities should be set at the setpoints recorded that show fill time going from rapid increases to a gradual rise.
It is important to realize of course that sometimes your process will require adjustments to be made in order to get a process running good parts again. Whenever possible, the technique above should be followed as closely as possible to assist you in running your processes at optimum efficiciencies.
When a part requires velocity profiling, each stage of the profile should be treated as a single velocity. Adjust the speed for each position from slow to fast, again monitoring the fill time as described above.
Coupled with set up standardization, adding scientific method to your process will greatly improve your control of each of your processes. It is important to note, that when a process has been established as consistently performing well it is a solid framework and should be followed closely with only minor changes to process. If you see a drastic change in process variables, it is important to realize that something changed. All of your recorded variables should be examined for change and when a change is discovered it should be analyzed for potential causes in the state of that condition(in ex: melt temp change due to a heater band going out).
Look for more on this subject in later articles....
Scientific molding is best defined as an extension of decoupled molding theory. When using decoupled molding procedures, a process is established with the part filling out at 95-98% of being completely filled with pack and hold pressures set at 0. A typical part at this percentage would appear slightly unfilled, or with a sinky appearance. Pack and hold are then added back into the process adding just enough to pack out the part(s).
Where scientific molding takes a step further is the extension of this procedure. The procedure of decoupling is completed, and then all data that can be recorded is taken..in essence taking a "snapshot" of the process while it is in a good running state. Typical molding variables to be accounted for are melt temperature,cushion, fill time, recovery time, peak pressure, cycle time and any other actuals data that can be recorded. The ones listed here are the basics, but I'm a bit more thorough. For instance, I like to get:
- actual mold temps in several locations(running state)
-water pressure(to and from process)
-barrel temperature actuals(each zone, using probe)
-replication of water set up(hard plummed, or water set up sheet, repeating flow directions)
-decomp.aft. rotation actual
The primary point of scientific theory is to repeat the process set-up and actuals to assure that a good process results by repeating the previous values. Because of this, it is only logical that the more data you are able to document when a job is running well, the more likely you will be able to repeat the molding condition the next time around.
That is a basic description...now for a little more advanced version, let's touch on some additional testing procedures...
-In addition to melt temp, a hold pressure study should be completed to determine the gate seal time
-With the shot size set at 85%, back pressure should be raised in increments...stopping the screw after allowing soak time during cycle to perform a melt temperature reading. This data should be recorded on a graph. When the melt temperature stops rising, this is the max setpoint for back pressure. Back pressure should be set at the point in the graph that major temperature increases falter, and melt temperature rises are more subtle in their rise.
-With the shot size set at 85%, velocities should be adjusted from slow to fast, graphing as described above. This time, fill time is the factor to watch. When fill stabilizes and the time stays equal, you have maxxed out your velocities. Again, optimally the velocities should be set at the setpoints recorded that show fill time going from rapid increases to a gradual rise.
It is important to realize of course that sometimes your process will require adjustments to be made in order to get a process running good parts again. Whenever possible, the technique above should be followed as closely as possible to assist you in running your processes at optimum efficiciencies.
When a part requires velocity profiling, each stage of the profile should be treated as a single velocity. Adjust the speed for each position from slow to fast, again monitoring the fill time as described above.
Coupled with set up standardization, adding scientific method to your process will greatly improve your control of each of your processes. It is important to note, that when a process has been established as consistently performing well it is a solid framework and should be followed closely with only minor changes to process. If you see a drastic change in process variables, it is important to realize that something changed. All of your recorded variables should be examined for change and when a change is discovered it should be analyzed for potential causes in the state of that condition(in ex: melt temp change due to a heater band going out).
Look for more on this subject in later articles....
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Plastic material colorants or concentrates overview
Plastics material colorants can sometimes cause nearly as many issues as the materials they are mixed with. It is important to have a solid understanding what potential molding issues to look for when issues such as color swirls, contamination or other potential colorant related issues arrise. Having a solid knowledge of the characteristics that are relevant can sometimes save alot of headache. This is an overview of colorants..their properties, usage and potential defects.
We must first define colorant. Colorants are materials that are almost always made with the the same base as the natural materials they are mixed with. There are several colorant types, the primary categories being pellet, liquid and powder forms. Pellet being the concentrate most commonly used, this article will primarily be aimed towards this method of developing a colorized material.
Pelletized colorants are often called concentrates due to their purpose. Initially the colors themselves start as pigments. These pigments of various colors are often blended together to become a particular color. For instance...a blue pigment can be combined with a yellow pigment to develop a shade of green. This color may require a lighter or darker pigment to become a particular shade of green. When the desired shade has been achieved, this concentrate is blended with a natural powdered base, such as nylon or polypropylene. This completed blend is then extruded and pelletized to be used with natural pellets to mold a specific color. I will describe the process in greater detail in the future... for now, I'll stick with the basics so I can concentrate more on areas that can lead to defects.
Each colorant has a specific ratio. These ratios are often established by the extrusion facility, but these are generally recommendations and there are times when less or more than the recommended ratio is used for cost savings, or better color content. The important thing to remember here is the cost of using too much colorant...as well as the cost of scrap generated by lack of colorant. Best practice dictates that the manufacturer's mixtures be followed. Quite often, this ratio is affixed to the label on the barrel, as well as documented on the Material Safety Data Sheet. The general formula is a virgin-to-concentrate number (in ex: "25:1" is twenty-five pounds of virgin with one pound of color added to it).
Newer age equipment (such as Maguire blenders) do a fantastic job of producing consistent blends. Some of the older equipment, however can be a bit more tricky. The digital equipment is harder to establish just what the proper setpoint should be when first setting up a job. The best method here is to use the manufacturer's color chip in comparison. Readings are taken from parts (NOTE: make sure the press was properly purged and the barrel has had time to heat soak while running several cycles prior to color testing) and compared to the color of the color chip using a McBeth Spectrometer, or similar piece of equipment. This analysis will help you determine if the colorant content is to dark or too light. Once a good read has been established, blender setpoints should be recorded for use in future runs.
Now we'll focus on the key issues regarding color concentrates. I will point out the most common first, then give some rare but equally as aggravating situations to watch for:
One of the first keys to success in molding with colorant is tracking lots. This is often overlooked, but treat colorant with the same precautions as your materials. Some examples of what can happen during an extrusion lot change are as noted:
-Contaminated pellets(poor screw cleaning at extrusion line changeover)
-pellet longs (pellet sizes inconsistent due to end/ beginning of run conditions, or poorly adjusted pelletizers)
-change in pellet size(pellet size changed in diameter or length at changeover
-wrong base material used
-lamination(poor screw clean at changeover while changing base materials)
-change in color (poor blend or improper pigment configuration)
-viscosity changes(too high or low heats, base powder lot change)
Knowing how and when to inspect your concentrates for these conditions is crucial to profitable use of colorant in comparison to precolored materials. Failure to consider these potential factors can lead to an improper diagnosis of a change in molding conditions. One pokayoke that your company should consider is requiring the concentrate supplier to provide a color chip molded from every lot with every new shipment.These chips should be verified for proper color content and visual aesthetics.
Colorant usage can have a profitability factor... but only as long as they are used and analyzed properly.
We must first define colorant. Colorants are materials that are almost always made with the the same base as the natural materials they are mixed with. There are several colorant types, the primary categories being pellet, liquid and powder forms. Pellet being the concentrate most commonly used, this article will primarily be aimed towards this method of developing a colorized material.
Pelletized colorants are often called concentrates due to their purpose. Initially the colors themselves start as pigments. These pigments of various colors are often blended together to become a particular color. For instance...a blue pigment can be combined with a yellow pigment to develop a shade of green. This color may require a lighter or darker pigment to become a particular shade of green. When the desired shade has been achieved, this concentrate is blended with a natural powdered base, such as nylon or polypropylene. This completed blend is then extruded and pelletized to be used with natural pellets to mold a specific color. I will describe the process in greater detail in the future... for now, I'll stick with the basics so I can concentrate more on areas that can lead to defects.
Each colorant has a specific ratio. These ratios are often established by the extrusion facility, but these are generally recommendations and there are times when less or more than the recommended ratio is used for cost savings, or better color content. The important thing to remember here is the cost of using too much colorant...as well as the cost of scrap generated by lack of colorant. Best practice dictates that the manufacturer's mixtures be followed. Quite often, this ratio is affixed to the label on the barrel, as well as documented on the Material Safety Data Sheet. The general formula is a virgin-to-concentrate number (in ex: "25:1" is twenty-five pounds of virgin with one pound of color added to it).
Newer age equipment (such as Maguire blenders) do a fantastic job of producing consistent blends. Some of the older equipment, however can be a bit more tricky. The digital equipment is harder to establish just what the proper setpoint should be when first setting up a job. The best method here is to use the manufacturer's color chip in comparison. Readings are taken from parts (NOTE: make sure the press was properly purged and the barrel has had time to heat soak while running several cycles prior to color testing) and compared to the color of the color chip using a McBeth Spectrometer, or similar piece of equipment. This analysis will help you determine if the colorant content is to dark or too light. Once a good read has been established, blender setpoints should be recorded for use in future runs.
Now we'll focus on the key issues regarding color concentrates. I will point out the most common first, then give some rare but equally as aggravating situations to watch for:
One of the first keys to success in molding with colorant is tracking lots. This is often overlooked, but treat colorant with the same precautions as your materials. Some examples of what can happen during an extrusion lot change are as noted:
-Contaminated pellets(poor screw cleaning at extrusion line changeover)
-pellet longs (pellet sizes inconsistent due to end/ beginning of run conditions, or poorly adjusted pelletizers)
-change in pellet size(pellet size changed in diameter or length at changeover
-wrong base material used
-lamination(poor screw clean at changeover while changing base materials)
-change in color (poor blend or improper pigment configuration)
-viscosity changes(too high or low heats, base powder lot change)
Knowing how and when to inspect your concentrates for these conditions is crucial to profitable use of colorant in comparison to precolored materials. Failure to consider these potential factors can lead to an improper diagnosis of a change in molding conditions. One pokayoke that your company should consider is requiring the concentrate supplier to provide a color chip molded from every lot with every new shipment.These chips should be verified for proper color content and visual aesthetics.
Colorant usage can have a profitability factor... but only as long as they are used and analyzed properly.
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Plastic Material Problems: Plastics Drying, Defects, Lot Changes, Material Changes, Properties and Solutions
A company's material handling methods and supplier choices can be their best friend or biggest nightmare. This article addresses typical material problems and solutions for approaching issues as they arrise. As I'm sure many of you are well aware, this is a monstrous topic...and my being able to identify and offer solutions to every material topic in a single article are slim to none. I will touch on a few topics at a time, and as time goes by I will expand on these in greater detail.
This particular article will touch on the various issues that plague our daily operations and offer some brief information on potential causes and solutions.
This particular article will touch on the various issues that plague our daily operations and offer some brief information on potential causes and solutions.
It is important to understand the variety of properties that are associated with different material categories. There are many different grades and types of plastics, and each grade has its own set of rules and potential defects. It is important to always be aware of what type of material you are running and you should always refer to your MSDS when issues arrise that could be directly related to a material issue. A good material supplier performs extensive testing on the materials they produce, and you should always be able to get resource information from them regarding the molding properties associated with the material they are providing you. Some examples of data they should be able to offer you are as follows:
- Mean melt temperature
- Melt Window
- Specific gravity
- Temperature settings (Window
- Potential Problems
- Velocities
- Back Pressure/ Hold Pressure settings
- Mold Temperature setpoints
These are the basic ones of importance...there are others that sometimes need to be addressed as well. You can get some pretty intensive information regarding a specific material's properties from the following website:
Materials sometimes require drying, and even removing the moisture for extended periods beyond manufacturer specs can lead to an array of other problems, such as splay and process variances. It is important to know what the minimum/ maximum drying times for your material should be, and when choosing a dryer you should calculate what the throughput of that dryer will be. There is a throughput calculator on the site that can help you determine this.
Drying temperatures are also important. I've seen situations where a material seemed to be performing incorrectly, and the cause was an individual trying to run at a higher temperature on the dryer for a shorter length of time. Sure, this may work on occasion...but it is not a good approach. Material specifications exist because people put a significant amount of testing and time determining how a material performed optimally. I will say that there are times you can push those specs to their limit...but any such action should be approached with caution and as a sample first. Changing your material procedure can affect your end product's functional, aesthetic and dimensional properties.
Materials that are susceptible to moisture should be considered when there are changes to your normal process. It is important to know what moisture level your material runs best at (moisture analyzer) and one of the first things you should check when moisture-specific defects arrise is the moisture content.
Another thing that can result in a drastic process change is a change from one lot of material to a new lot. I cannot stress how important it is for you to track your lots! There have been a number of times that I have witnessed a huge crisis that was identified as a change in lot properties.
I've just barely scratched the surface on this topic. Material can make or break consistency and profitability in a company. Buying the cheapest does not concrete being the most economic approach. If there are huge variances in your processes (resulting in scrap) that can be resolved by buying a better brand or a specific blend, then this may be the best approach to a long term solution.
Plastics Processing and Plastics Problems: 4plastics 411 blog
I'm going to switch gears with this blog a bit. Initially, I was just going to use it to update what changes were coming in regards to the site. I figured I would update it once a week...that way people who follow the site loyally would be aware of upcoming changes.
Today I realized that I could use the blog more effectively. Over the past 8 months, I've been writing content for the site in reference to scientific molding principles, plastics troubleshooting,
plastics defects, etc...and once the content was written, I would transfer that information into html as articles. This is a very slow and cumbersome process... There is already alot of content on the site, but I probably could have written about twice as much in the same amount of time.
Then it hit me...rather than add one post to this blog weekly...I could be alot more effective by writing my articles in this format, and leave HTML for the content that makes it easier for you to access outside sources, or other events that require coding to provide you with a simple approach to a specific task.
From now on, I am going to write articles in this format daily that address specific plastics topics for insight aimed toward novices in the field... as well as professionals. I am only going to say that there will be no specific topic other than plastics in general. This could be tooling, robotics, material, scientific molding... whatever topic I choose for the day.
I'm not going to promise that you will always agree with my insight... nor will I be able to cover some topics in the depth that they will sometimes deserve. I've always said that every molder is unique... and every processor has there own perspective pertaining to what was theory, fact or merely a molding myth. My point will be to pass along issues I've faced personally over the years, and approaches that we took to resolve problems. Sometimes we found quick and easy fixes to molding issues...occasionally we beat our head against the wall for months to find out we had been dancing around a simple fix.
One thing I learned over the years is that none of us is always right...and even the worst molder can sometimes have the best insight into how to fix a problem. The approach that I eventually followed was this...
Any information given to me as a pure and undisputable fact or method could possibly be untrue or not the best idea or approach. There is always the potential for a unique perspective or a new concept to be the best method of handling a problem. On the same note... it is important to remember that any notion that you as a molder have determined as concrete and seemingly never-changing could be wrong. It is important to listen to the ideas of everyone on the floor, and base your approach to a problem on as much information as you are able to collect prior to taking action. Good solutions are developed from complete and true knowledge of the overall issue.
Some might say, " We don't have time to dig deeper...we have to react!". I understand that feeling. I know that there are times on the floor when we as processors have to "bandaid" a crisis...because customer demand and thin lead times demand it to be so. It doesn't change our goal of "continuous improvement". We have a responsibility to our manufacturing team to iron out the bugs in every system.. and I believe that seasoned molders stay for 20 years due to the love of that chase. We have to make time to find solutions... to make the fire (crisis) profitable...to make the fire go away.
Here's to the chase...may we all merge on the winning side..
Garrett MacKenzie/4plastics411 Editor-in Chief
Today I realized that I could use the blog more effectively. Over the past 8 months, I've been writing content for the site in reference to scientific molding principles, plastics troubleshooting,
plastics defects, etc...and once the content was written, I would transfer that information into html as articles. This is a very slow and cumbersome process... There is already alot of content on the site, but I probably could have written about twice as much in the same amount of time.
Then it hit me...rather than add one post to this blog weekly...I could be alot more effective by writing my articles in this format, and leave HTML for the content that makes it easier for you to access outside sources, or other events that require coding to provide you with a simple approach to a specific task.
From now on, I am going to write articles in this format daily that address specific plastics topics for insight aimed toward novices in the field... as well as professionals. I am only going to say that there will be no specific topic other than plastics in general. This could be tooling, robotics, material, scientific molding... whatever topic I choose for the day.
I'm not going to promise that you will always agree with my insight... nor will I be able to cover some topics in the depth that they will sometimes deserve. I've always said that every molder is unique... and every processor has there own perspective pertaining to what was theory, fact or merely a molding myth. My point will be to pass along issues I've faced personally over the years, and approaches that we took to resolve problems. Sometimes we found quick and easy fixes to molding issues...occasionally we beat our head against the wall for months to find out we had been dancing around a simple fix.
One thing I learned over the years is that none of us is always right...and even the worst molder can sometimes have the best insight into how to fix a problem. The approach that I eventually followed was this...
Any information given to me as a pure and undisputable fact or method could possibly be untrue or not the best idea or approach. There is always the potential for a unique perspective or a new concept to be the best method of handling a problem. On the same note... it is important to remember that any notion that you as a molder have determined as concrete and seemingly never-changing could be wrong. It is important to listen to the ideas of everyone on the floor, and base your approach to a problem on as much information as you are able to collect prior to taking action. Good solutions are developed from complete and true knowledge of the overall issue.
Some might say, " We don't have time to dig deeper...we have to react!". I understand that feeling. I know that there are times on the floor when we as processors have to "bandaid" a crisis...because customer demand and thin lead times demand it to be so. It doesn't change our goal of "continuous improvement". We have a responsibility to our manufacturing team to iron out the bugs in every system.. and I believe that seasoned molders stay for 20 years due to the love of that chase. We have to make time to find solutions... to make the fire (crisis) profitable...to make the fire go away.
Here's to the chase...may we all merge on the winning side..
Garrett MacKenzie/4plastics411 Editor-in Chief
Saturday, November 15, 2008
Can't we all just get along?
I commented this blog written elsewhere..in response to a very lopsided post based on environmental hysteria, rather than data..here's the link:
http://theonlyonewehave.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/70-of-americans-dont-know-plastic-is-made-with-oil/#comment-405
So blatantly incorrect, I had to respond:
Just like you… I too am concerned by the current environmental situation…enough so to leave an engineering position on the production side of things and jump fence to the recycling side. I intend to use my skillsets to make a difference…not my voice to create a panic.
I have been in the process of gaining data…for the purpose of building a recycling center in Michigan. One thing I know is this…I am not biased about who’s data I use…but your statement that plastics production accounts for 10% of the worlds oil consumption is blatantly incorrect…the numbers I’m seeing are in the 3-5% range…with improvements made over the last couple of years… and a trend towards making things right.
I will say that I agree with you fully..there is a very strong need to educate the public. But education is NOT defined as propaganda…it is a clear representation of both sides and ALL issues..so that educated decisions can be made based on the facts…not ropes hung in a medieval witch hunt.
I run a plastics website…and I have a section devoted to environmental concerns. This section exists for the sole purpose that I as a person who loves this planet have the same concerns regarding its misuse as you do.But the products I produce have been in your best interest…I’ve been breathing the fumes you fear for 23 years now…and I am as healthy as a horse.
Bags an issue…you betcha…marine aquatic issues…certainly…but that is why I’m here. Because I care, and want to make a difference. I am glad to help…I’m more than willing to listen. But remember…there are two sides. And they live and breathe the same air….
I'm telling you, folks...it is time for us to step up and educate those who are operating on mistruths and assumptions.
http://theonlyonewehave.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/70-of-americans-dont-know-plastic-is-made-with-oil/#comment-405
So blatantly incorrect, I had to respond:
Just like you… I too am concerned by the current environmental situation…enough so to leave an engineering position on the production side of things and jump fence to the recycling side. I intend to use my skillsets to make a difference…not my voice to create a panic.
I have been in the process of gaining data…for the purpose of building a recycling center in Michigan. One thing I know is this…I am not biased about who’s data I use…but your statement that plastics production accounts for 10% of the worlds oil consumption is blatantly incorrect…the numbers I’m seeing are in the 3-5% range…with improvements made over the last couple of years… and a trend towards making things right.
I will say that I agree with you fully..there is a very strong need to educate the public. But education is NOT defined as propaganda…it is a clear representation of both sides and ALL issues..so that educated decisions can be made based on the facts…not ropes hung in a medieval witch hunt.
I run a plastics website…and I have a section devoted to environmental concerns. This section exists for the sole purpose that I as a person who loves this planet have the same concerns regarding its misuse as you do.But the products I produce have been in your best interest…I’ve been breathing the fumes you fear for 23 years now…and I am as healthy as a horse.
Bags an issue…you betcha…marine aquatic issues…certainly…but that is why I’m here. Because I care, and want to make a difference. I am glad to help…I’m more than willing to listen. But remember…there are two sides. And they live and breathe the same air….
I'm telling you, folks...it is time for us to step up and educate those who are operating on mistruths and assumptions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
